Civil Rights Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 290
Kingston v. Strange et al
as 1:2024cv12021
Defendant: Dottie Fulginiti, Deborah Balcarek, Peter Deschenes and others
Plaintiff: Pro se litigant Aimee L Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Gary et al
as 1:2024cv11603
Plaintiff: Robert L Gary
Defendant: Frederick Gary and Boston Police (B3) District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mancini v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30080
Defendant: City of Springfield, MGM Springfield and Massachusetts Police Department
Plaintiff: Jennifer L. Mancini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ritrovato v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2024cv11166
Plaintiff: Pro se litigant Nicholas A Ritrovato, III
Defendant: Michael L Fitzgerald and Paul Rodriques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gary v. Dorchester Court et al
as 1:2024cv11529
Defendant: Dorchester Court and Attorney Stuart
Plaintiff: Robert L Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Feds Agents et al
as 1:2024cv10982
Plaintiff: Keon L. Boggs
Defendant: Feds Agents, Bureau of Investigation and Patrol State Trooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff: Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant: The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff: Keon L. Boggs
Defendant: 34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff: Keon L. Boggs
Defendant: Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10984
Plaintiff: Keon L. Boggs
Defendant: Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?