Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GERBER v. WARD et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
LENA GERBER
Defendant:
ISAAC WARD, AROOSTOOK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, JEFFERY PICKERING ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lu v. Davis, et al
as 22-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN DAVIS, TYLER OSTHOLTHOFF, ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES NORTHEAST, INC. and others
Interested Party:
ABM INDUSTRY GROUPS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lu v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv11968
Defendant:
Anderson & Kreiger LLP, Dominic Blue, Nina Pickering-Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickering-George v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 14-1239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PICKERING-GEORGE, a/k/a John Robert Daley, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Judicial individual entities capacity et al, UNITED STATES AGENCY, Judicial individual entities capacity et al, ADMINISTRATION AGENCY and others
Pickering-George v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2013cv10157
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, United States Agency, United States Official Courts and Judicial System and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lucia v. City of Peabody et al
as 1:2010cv11228
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Lucia
Defendant:
City of Peabody , Peabody Police Department , Michael J Bonfanti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
