Civil Rights Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Benitez Caceres v. Bradley Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff: Mirca Benitez Caceres
Defendant: Bradley Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital and Seven Hills Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00373
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Drohan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant: North Providence Police Department, Maureen Drohan, Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families and others
Plaintiff: James E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RI Association of the Deaf et al v. Lifespan Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00415
Plaintiff: RI Association of the Deaf , Kathryn Arcana and Peggy Merhi
Defendant: Lifespan Corporation, Lifespan Physician Group, Inc. and Rhode Island Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00488
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00250
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?