Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CHARLES MOORE
Interested Party:
MARC A. WHALEY, BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL, IRINA MEZEHBOUSKY, MD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Shu Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 12-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
PAULA AENNGER, THEA A. STEWART, ST. MARY'S CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
