Cases 101 - 110 of 277
FOX v. USA
as 2:2016cv00514
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WALTER SCOTT FOX, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers v. NH State Prison, Warden
as 1:2016fp00388
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH State Prison, Warden
Petitioner:
Scott Nicholas Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANILO LOPES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, ANTHONY MENDONSA, THOMAS M. TOCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN BELAND, PETER WALKER, RANDY FISHER and others
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 1:2016cv11666
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Bennett, Department of Correction, Executive Office of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontes v. Kettle et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Courtney Scott Fontes
Defendant:
Matthew Kettle, Walter Duffy, Steven Cabral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, et al
as 16-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY C. BISHOP, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, WENDY RIEBE, individually and in her official capacity as Health Services Administrator for CCS, ROBERT CLINTON, MD, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Medical Director for CCS and others
Brown v. USA
as 1:2016cv00327
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scott M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. USA
as 1:2016cv00328
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scott M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. USA
as 1:2016cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scott Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Paiva v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettle, William Galligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
