Cases 11 - 20 of 191
Cruz v. Billadeau et al
as 1:2023cv10344
Plaintiff:
Felix Tomas Cruz
Defendant:
Billadeau, Bonito, Caverro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. USA
as 2:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
AKEEM CRUZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yarde v. Mici et al
as 1:2022cv11395
Plaintiff:
David Yarde
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici, Steven Kenneway, Nestor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 4:2022cv40103
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, Thomas Quinn, C.P.E.S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Semprit v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2022cv01365
Plaintiff:
Abraham Cruz-Semprit
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lech v. Von Goeler, et al
as 22-1507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIDIA LECH
Defendant / Appellee:
DOROTHEA VON GOELER, BAYSTATE MEDICAL PRACTICES, INC., HAMPDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Melendez Cruz v. Hudson et al
as 1:2022cv10856
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Thomas M Hudson, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Bristol County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 1:2022cv10581
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, C.P.C.S, Javier Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Vazquez v. US
as 22-1230
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUIS XADIEL CRUZ-VAZQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Cruz-De los Santos v. USA
as 3:2022cv01150
Petitioner:
Audie Cruz-De Los Santos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
