Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Taylor v. AbbVie Inc.
as 23-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE WILLIAM TAYLOR, a/k/a Tad Taylor
Defendant / Appellee:
ABBOTT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and ABBVIE INC.
Ausar v. Salisbury
as 23-1550
Petitioner / Appellant:
KAM AUSAR, a/k/a Jeffrey Alston
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
JAMES v. REDMOND et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
REDMOND, JAMES, K METZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Bain
as 22-1434
Petitioner / Appellant:
YRVENS BAIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
YRVENS BAIN, a/k/a E
Ibrahim v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10569
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Ibrahim, Jr
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foltz v. Harrington et al
as 1:2021cv11940
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Ireland Foltz
Defendant:
William K. Harrington and John P. Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, NH Attorney General Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv11585
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.,
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasquez v. Martin, et al.
as 1:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Martin, Major/Chief Michael Nessinger, Sergeant A Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
