Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 1:2011cv10231
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Jeffery Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 1:2011cv10083
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
Jeffery Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abernathy v. Dickhaut, et al
as 1:2010cv11504
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Robert J. Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cryer v. UMass Medical Correctional et al
as 1:2010cv11346
Plaintiff:
Derek Sincere Black Wolf Cryer
Defendant:
UMass Medical Correctional, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Jones et al
as 4:2010cv40127
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Ruth Jones and William Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stroman v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2010cv40083
Plaintiff:
Evans E. Stroman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Umass Correctional Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. O'Toole, et al
as 10-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, United States District Court Judge, MARILYN H. PATEL, United States District Court Judge and OTHERS UNNAMED
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 4:2010cv40034
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. O'Toole et al
as 1:2010cv10071
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
George A. O'Toole, Marilyn H Patel and Other Unnamed Justices,Judges and Magistrate Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Phelps v. Holder, et al
as 09-2542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, CAROLYN A. SABOL, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 0222, AFL-CIO, f/k/a Unknown Federal Employees Labor Unions and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
