Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01312
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Sanchez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00231
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10746
Petitioner:
Elias Sanchez
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Divris
as 1:2022cv10676
Petitioner:
Oscar Sanchez
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquez-Sanchez v. Department of Justice of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Jose A Marquez-Sanchez and Jose A. Marquez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez, Department of Justice of Puerto Rico and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez-Sanchez v. Ortiz-Montero
as 3:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
Jose A Marquez-Sanchez and Jose A. Marquez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Nestor Ortiz-Montero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raso v. McKee et al
as 1:2021cv00271
Defendant:
Laura Pisaturo, Gina M Raimondo, Jorge C. Armesto and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Raso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv10021
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sanchez v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2020cv00304
Petitioner:
Thomas Sanchez
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
