Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv30132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
D'ANGELO v. USA
as 2:2016cv00290
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MICHEL D'ANGELO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dabrieo v. Wall, et al
as 15-1907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE DABRIEO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA WALL, CESAR ARCHILLA, CHARLENE BONNER and others
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Hill v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv11482
Plaintiff:
Gerald M. Hill
Defendant:
Josh Wall, Cesar Archilla, Charlene Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabrieo v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 1:2013cv13105
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dabrieo
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Joshua Wall, Cesar Archilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towle v. Hartshorn
as 1:2013fp00485
Defendant:
Michelle Hartshorn
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv11783
Plaintiff:
Bruce K. Wilborn
Defendant:
Joshua Wall, Cesar Archilla, Charlene Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Michelle
as 1:2013cv11550
Petitioner:
Charles B. Price
Respondent:
Lisa Michelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bartlett v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 1:2013cv11479
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bartlett
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Josh Wall, Cesar Archilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osei v. A.T. Wall et al
as 1:2012cv00717
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, James Weeden, Michelle Auger and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolph V. Osei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
