Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Johnson v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2016fp00442
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Clevon Tyrone Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Tatum
as 16-2182
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ESKER L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv30132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Davis v. Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital et al
as 1:2016fp00311
Defendant:
Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital, Timothy J. Dozier, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fletcher et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016fp00189
Defendant:
FNU Bailey, Clint L. Cranford, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Neilson Dain Fletcher, Todd Klink, Kevin McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2016cv11311
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2016cv11298
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shelton A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00322
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alphonso D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Masonoff, et al v. Dubois, et al
as 16-1742
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MASONOFF, ROBERT FOSTER, ANTHONY SMITH and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
KEVIN UPSHAW
Defendant:
LARRY E. DUBOIS, Commissioner of Correction
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN BISSONETTE, Superintendent of Southeastern Correctional Center and RICHARD GJ GRELOTTI, Administrator of Bridgewater Complex
Interested Party:
MICHAEL TARRANT, VICTOR VEGA, ROBERT M. BRUZZESE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
