Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Davis v. Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital et al
as 1:2016fp00311
Defendant:
Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital, Timothy J. Dozier, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ross v. US, et al
as 16-1911
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANNY ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and WARDEN S. SPAULDING
Fletcher et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016fp00189
Defendant:
FNU Bailey, Clint L. Cranford, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Neilson Dain Fletcher, Todd Klink, Kevin McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lyons v. Grondolsky, et al
as 16-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON LORENZO LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, LINDA SANDERS, UNITED STATES and others
Radick v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015fp00483
Defendant:
FNU Chen, FCI Berlin, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Thomas Radick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015fp00381
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, FCI Berlin, Warden, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. US BOP
as 15-1410
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MAHER
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Ross v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2014cv30123
Petitioner:
Danny Ross
Respondent:
S. Spaulding and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boldiga v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2014cv12135
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Boldiga
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
