Cases 51 - 60 of 144
Sanchez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015fp00381
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, FCI Berlin, Warden, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. US BOP
as 15-1410
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MAHER
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Ross v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2014cv30123
Petitioner:
Danny Ross
Respondent:
S. Spaulding and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boldiga v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2014cv12135
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Boldiga
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Widi, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00160
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Gaunyea, FNU Glue and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martello v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv13089
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Martello
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Diane Sommer and Other Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Pinson et al v. John Doe (s) et al
as 1:2013cv13077
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Mikeal Stine
Defendant:
John Doe (s) and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv11458
Plaintiff:
Harry Vargas
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MDC Broooklyn Federal Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
