Cases 51 - 60 of 188
Espejo Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2015cv00228
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Espejo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez-Ramos v. US
as 15-1628
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGO SANCHEZ RAMOS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Soto-Hernandez
as 3:2015cv01280
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rivera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walter Soto-Hernandez, Cesar Miranda, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2015cv00093
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. Roden
as 15-1197
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAGOBERTO SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY RODEN, Superintendent - MCI Norfolk
Cesareo-Rosado v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
Yamil Doel Cesareo-Rosado
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, El Pueblo de Puerto Rico, Yolanda Cardona-Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero-Galindez v. Canino-Sanchez et al
as 3:2015cv01098
Plaintiff:
Angel Romero-Galindez
Defendant:
Giovanni Canino-Sanchez and Eric Pijuan-Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Colon v. ELA et al
as 3:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera-Colon
Defendant:
ELA, FNU Borrero, FNU Perez-Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muniz-Ruberte v. Pereira Castillo, et al
as 14-2193
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUBEN MUNIZ-RUBERTE
Respondent - Appellee:
MIGUEL PEREIRA CASTILLO, ANTONIO M. SAGARDIA-DEJESUS, Attorney General, Puerto Rico and COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Respondent:
ROBERTO J. SANCHEZ-RAMOS, Attorney General, Puerto Rico
Maldonado-Pagan v. Administracion de Correccion, et al
as 14-2024
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIANO MALDONADO-PAGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ADMINISTRACION DE CORRECCION and LUIS SANCHEZ BETANCES, Attorney General of Puerto Rico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
