Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Rice v. Resendes, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA J. ADAMS, BLENDA A. RICE and PATRICIA U. ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN M. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN W. RESENDES, CHRISTOPHER M. PACHECO and SAMUEL RAMUS
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, EDWARD J. DOHERTY, MICHAEL KASPRZAK and others
Jackson v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Steward Lakpor, Steward Martin, Deputy Warden Salisbury and others
Plaintiff:
Earl R. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulgiam v. Kenneway
as 1:2018cv12106
Respondent:
Steven Kenneway
Plaintiff:
Earl Fulgiam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schultz v. Meffen et al
as 1:2018cv11818
Defendant:
William Micucci Licsw, MD, PhD Van Nguyen, Patrice Hollomon and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MACK BATTLE, JR
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SOMERSET COUNTY, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commonwealth of MA, et al
as 17-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON EARL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY BOARD and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Montrond v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv10505
Plaintiff:
Amaral Montrond
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Turco, III, Michael Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Acceto et al
as 1:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Earl Short
Defendant:
Capt. Acceto, Officer Cummings, Officer Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dessesaure v. USA
as 1:2016cv11144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Earl Dessesaure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
