Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DiCrescenzo v. Salem MA Probate & Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv11268
Plaintiff:
Amanda DiCrescenzo
Defendant:
Salem MA Probate & Family Court and Mary Rudolph Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kifor v. Middlesex Probate and Family Court et al
as 1:2020cv11601
Respondent:
Mass DOR. and Middlesex Probate and Family Court
Petitioner:
Imre Kifor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Da Silva v. Cardoso et al
as 1:2020cv10091
Defendant:
Tiago Rassilan, Cardoso, Probate and Family Court and others
Plaintiff:
Welson Henrique Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Probate and Family Court Middlsex County
as 1:2015cv13664
Petitioner:
William Carpenter
Respondent:
Probate and Family Court Middlsex County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv30171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Worcester Probate and Family et al
as 4:2014cv40113
Plaintiff:
John P. Bowen
Defendant:
Worcester Probate and Family, Steven Abrahams, Justice of Probate and Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renkowic v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 12-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD P. RENKOWIC
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE TRIAL COURT, PAULA M. CAREY, Chief Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
