Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Coleman v. Lynds
as 3:2024cv30043
Plaintiff:
Wayland X Coleman
Defendant:
Joann Lynds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ainooson v. O'Gara et al
as 1:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Justice E. Ainooson
Defendant:
James O'Gara, Sheila C Kelly, Joann Lynds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lynds
as 1:2023cv10025
Petitioner:
Timothy Smith
Respondent:
Joann M. Lynds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benner v. Demoura et al
as 1:2020cv12269
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Dolen, Douglas H. Demoura, Several Other Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Benner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahdi v. Mici et al
as 1:2020cv10424
Defendant:
Carol Mici, Joann Lynds and David Duarte
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Mahdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fournier v. LePage, et al
as 15-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK D. FOURNIER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LEPAGE, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH PONTE, individually and in his official capacity and others
Saunders v. Fortier
as 15-1202
Petitioner - Appellant:
DIANNA SAUNDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOANNE FORTIER, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison for Women
FOURNIER v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
FRANK DANIEL FOURNIER
Defendant:
PAUL LEPAGE, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faust v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2014cv13295
Plaintiff:
James B. Faust
Defendant:
Steven Tompkins, Yolanda Smith, Luis S. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
