Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Alege v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Olayinka A. Alege
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boudreau v. State of Rhode Island
as 24-1470
Petitioner:
JASON D. BOUDREAU
Respondent:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
DeBritto v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Timothy DeBritto
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and R.I. Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ausar v. Salisbury
as 23-1550
Petitioner / Appellant:
KAM AUSAR, a/k/a Jeffrey Alston
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Boudreau v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Jason Boudreau
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atryzek v. Neronha
as 23-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEBASTIAN W. ATRYZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER F. NERONHA, in his individual and official capacity as Rhode Island Attorney General, RHODE ISLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, in their individual and official capacity, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in their individual and official capacity and others
Munir v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Hasim Munir
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and Paul A Suttell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swiridowsky v. Wall, et al
as 23-1319
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SWIRIDOWSKY
Respondent / Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Navarro v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Navarro
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
