Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mongue v. The Wheatleigh Corporation, et al
as 24-1488
Plaintiff:
ARLETA MONGUE, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Defendant:
WHEATLEIGH CORPORATION, L. LINFIELD SIMON, SUSAN SIMON and others
Jackson v. Personal Representative of Donald Comb et al
as 1:2023cv12208
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jackson
Defendant:
Personal Representative of Donald Comb, James V. Ellard, Richard Ireland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
New England BioLabs, Inc. v. Miller, et al
as 23-1274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
COMMITTEE OF NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS, INC. EMPLOYEES' STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF DONALD COMB, JAMES V. ELLARD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RALPH T. MILLER
Interested Party:
BERKELEY RESEARCH GROUP VALUATION SERVICES, LLC
Minturn v. Monrad, et al
as 22-1200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT B. MINTURN
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE H. MONRAD, individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ernest E. Monrad, PETER J. BLAMPFIELD, GEORGE P. BEAL and others
Defendant:
NORTHEAST INVESTORS TRUST
Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc.
as 22-1130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA FRAGA, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PREMIUM RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
Fraga v. Premium Retail Services, Inc.
as 22-1101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARA FRAGA, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
PREMIUM RETAIL SERVICES, INC.
Tower et al v. Chase et al
as 1:2020cv11225
Defendant:
Arthur M. Piccolo, Personal Rep. Michele P. Chase, Albert A. Piccolo, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Piccolo and Michelle M. Tower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
CHASSE v. OPM OFFICE OF PERSONAL MANAGEMENT
as 1:2019cv00328
Defendant:
OPM OFFICE OF PERSONAL MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff:
TEODORA I CHASSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Brotherston, et al v. Putnam Investments, et al
as 17-1711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BROTHERSTON, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Putnam Retirement Plan and JOAN GLANCY, individually and as representative of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the Putnam Retirement Plan
Defendant - Appellee:
PUTNAM INVESTMENTS, PUTNAM BENEFITS INVESTMENT COMMITTEE D, ROBERT REYNOLDS and others
Defendant:
PUTNAM BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE and ELLEN NEARY
Doran v. J. P. Noonan Transp. Inc., et al
as 16-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE DORAN, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. COAKLEY, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and MARK MORIARITY, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
J. P. NOONAN TRANSPORTATION, INC., CLANCY TRANSPORTATION, INC., J. PETER NOONAN, SR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
