Cases 131 - 140 of 10,557
DELEO v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
SHAW et al v. FADDEN
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHAW and LISA SHAW
Defendant:
MATTHEW FADDEN doing business as CUSTOM CARE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY v. DRISTEEM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ACADIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DRISTEEM CORPORATION and EMERSON-SWAN INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
GARDNER v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
ELLEN GARDNER
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. TOWN OF FREEPORT et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
MARTINA SULLIVAN
Defendant:
TOWN OF FREEPORT and MATTHEW PILLSBURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, MJ MCFADDEN, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. MCCORMACK et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
ANDREW MCCORMACK, BRYCE TURGENSON, SCOTT LEE ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS et al v. BANGOR SAVINGS BANK et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS and BRIENNA ROWE
Defendant:
BANGOR SAVINGS BANK, TRESTEN BERGERON and GABRIELLE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
