Cases 141 - 150 of 258
Anastacio Escobar-Portillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73389
Petitioner:
ANASTACIO ESCOBAR-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 13-35887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
USA v. Anastacio Soto
as 13-20456
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANASTACIO ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto
Edison et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04679
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edison , Jorge Fernandez , Francisco Galvan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , Transocean Deepwater Inc and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1349 Outer Continental Land Shelf Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01194
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Edison et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01431
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edison , Jorge Fernandez , Francisco Galvan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration and Production Inc , Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and Transocean Deepwater Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edison et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as TXS/4:13-cv-01431
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edison , Jorge Fernandez , Francisco Galvan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc. , Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and Transocean Deepwater Services, Inc.
Julio Suarez-Diaz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3605
Petitioner:
JULIO ANASTACIO SUAREZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Anastacio Ortega
as 13-40319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANASTACIO ORTEGA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
