Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11503
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Norton v. Archetype Consulting, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv11299
Defendant:
Max Gomez, Jason Webster and Archetype Consulting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamarah Norton
Not Classified By Court:
Andy Schlosberg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Del Valle-Ortega
as 19-2252
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRES DEL VALLE-ORTEGA, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Andy Caimito
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Gonzalez et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv11855
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andy Napoleonis and Ms. Marielis Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lankford et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00674
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Charlene Lankford and Andy Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Molnar v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00465
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Andie Molnar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montalvo-Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01084
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
ANDY ENRIQUE MONTALVO MARTINEZ and Andy Enrique Montalvo-Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
