Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 195
The Board of Trustees v. ILA Local 1740, AFL-CIO, et al
as 22-1872
Plaintiff / Appellee: BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their capacity as trustees and fiduciaries of the ILA PRSSA PENSION FUND
Defendant / Appellant: ILA LOCAL 1740, AFL-CIO, an Unincorporated Labor Organization
The Board of Trustees v. ILA Local 1740, AFL-CIO, et al
as 22-1591
Plaintiff / Appellee: BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their capacity as trustees and fiduciaries of the ILA PRSSA PENSION FUND
Defendant / Appellant: ILA LOCAL 1740, AFL-CIO, an Unincorporated Labor Organization
Peltz-Steele v. Umass Faculty Federation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD J. PELTZ-STEELE
Defendant / Appellee: UMASS FACULTY FEDERATION, LOCAL 1895 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, MARTIN MEEHAN, In his official capacity as President of the University of Massachusetts, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, In her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, by its trustee Juan Negron v. Union de Carpinteros de Puerto Rico et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01267
Plaintiff: International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, by its trustee Juan Negron
Defendant: Union de Carpinteros de Puerto Rico, German Rivera-Rosado and Rafael Rodriguez-Pagan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Dyer, as Employee Benefit Funds Administrator et al v. Iron Works, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10739
Plaintiff: Veronica Dyer, as Employee Benefit Funds Administrator and Local 7 of the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO
Defendant: Douglas Iron Works, LLC and Bryan Tobey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Coca-Cola Beverages Northeast, Inc. v. Local 170, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO
as 4:2022cv40021
Plaintiff: Coca-Cola Beverages Northeast, Inc.
Defendant: Local 170, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
NLRB v. USPS
as 22-1049
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: US POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party: HEATHER L. TAYLOR, NLRB Specialist, ROBERT A. PEROCCHI, JR., President, American Postal Workers Union, Bangor, LAURA A. SACKS, Regional Director and others
Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO et al v. NH Department of Education, Commissioner et al
as 1:2021cv01063
Plaintiff: Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO, Ryan Richman, John Dube and others
Defendant: NH Department of Education, Commissioner, NH Commission on Human Rights, Chair and NH Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating For Campus Equality, et al
as 21-1853
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?