Cases 11 - 20 of 29
US v. Cordero-Rosario
as 17-1652
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
HILTON ALEXIS CORDERO-ROSARIO
Interested Party:
SISTEMA DE RETIRO, (ELA)
US v. Cordero-Rosario
as 17-1655
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
HILTON ALEXIS CORDERO-ROSARIO
Interested Party:
SISTEMA DE RETIRO, (ELA)
Rodriguez-Baez v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2017cv01185
Plaintiff:
Pedro Antonio Rodriguez-Baez
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion and ELA PR Correctional Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borrero-Camacho v. ELA PR et al
as 3:2016cv02041
Plaintiff:
Juan Borrero-Camacho
Defendant:
ELA PR, Departamento de Correccion y Rehabilitacion, Administracion de Correccion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez-Garcia v. ELA PR et al
as 3:2016cv02040
Petitioner:
John S. Vazquez-Garcia
Respondent:
ELA PR, Luis A Ocasio-Montanez and Cesar Miranda-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aponte-Gonzalez v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2016cv01175
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Aponte-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion and ELA PR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo-Muniz v. ELA et al
as 3:2015cv02268
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Arroyo-Muniz
Defendant:
ELA, Policia De Puerto Rico and Franqui Carlos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraballo-Cepeda v. ELA et al
as 3:2015cv02270
Plaintiff:
Wanaget Caraballo-Cepeda
Defendant:
ELA and Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo-Muniz v. ELA PR et al
as 3:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Arroyo-Muniz
Defendant:
ELA PR, Policia Estatal, Fiscalia de Aguadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rivera-Colon v. ELA et al
as 3:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera-Colon
Defendant:
ELA, FNU Borrero, FNU Perez-Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
