Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Horton v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00374
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Teresa Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE R HORTON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Duncan-Horton v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00628
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corp, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Getinge AB and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Duncan-Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. J&W Grading, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown, Jr. , Nathan Cole , Aaron Floyd and others
Defendant:
J&W Grading, Inc., ECO IQ LLC, MIGO IQ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Brown et al v. J&W Grading, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01262
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown, Jr., Nathan Cole, Aaron Floyd and others
Defendant:
J&W Grading, Inc., ECO IQ LLC, MIGO IQ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
HORTON v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
DIANA HORTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Georgiadi
as 15-2194
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
Q EVRIPIDES GEORGIADIS, a/k/a Dr. Eric, a/k/a Eric Georgiadis
Interested Party:
GOOGLE, INC., KENNETH DAVLIN, AMERICAN ETHANOL CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
