Cases 11 - 20 of 33
LAVERDIERE v. BALCOM et al
as 2:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
IRIS LAVERDIERE
Defendant:
MICHAEL BALCOM, SR, AMANDA WOOLFORD , JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DALL-LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
BRIDGET PARKER
Defendant:
JOSH DALL-LEIGHTON, SCOTT LANDRY , RENEE SHANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THIABAULT v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
NORBERT THIABAULT
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOFF v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 2:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R SCHOFF, JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JODY BRETON, SCOTT LANDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JAMES v. BUENO et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant:
ERIC BUENO, RANDALL LIBERTY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANCTIL v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
STEVE ANCTIL JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DREWRY v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
BRANDON B DREWRY
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE et al v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
RIKKI LYNN WHITE
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY , PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT , TROY MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
