Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 13-1695
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FONTAINE and others
Defendant: BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Deka International S.A. Luxemb, et al v. Genzyme Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1085
Plaintiff: VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JON RAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG, CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION FUND and GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID P. MEEKER, MICHAEL S. WYZGA, GENZYME CORPORATION and others
Interested Party: IRON WORKERS and HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS' LOCALS 472 & 172 FUNDS, Institutional Investors
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al
as 09-1196
Not Classified By Court: PURDUE PHARMA COMPANY, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BEN VENUE LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH VANDERWAL, VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant: M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Kim v. Holder
as 11-2314
Petitioner: JIN OH KIM
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Kim v. Holder
as 11-2314
Petitioner: JIN OH KIM
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2274
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?