Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901 v. UPS
as 3:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901
Defendant:
UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samora v. UPS-scs
as 1:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
INOSENCIO BAEZ SAMORA
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and UPS-scs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John R Wade et al vs. Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust et al
as 1:2020cv10523
Defendant:
Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust, ROBERT LANDRY, ROBERT R. NEWELL and others
Plaintiff:
John R Wade, Taylor Wade, Sharon Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fisher v. Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11381
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
Plaintiff:
Samuel Fisher, Leroy Jacobs, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12338
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and J&V Logistics LLC
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richardson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Souza v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11292
Plaintiff:
Sheri Souza
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc. and The UPS Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's (Syndicate 457) v. American Airlines Inc, et al
as 3:2017cv02130
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's (Syndicate 457)
Defendant:
American Airlines Inc and UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
