Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv11054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv13184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, Inc.
as 11-1876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC.
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, SAMUEL ROSENBERG, BARRY AMIDON and others
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, Inc.
as 11-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, SAMUEL ROSENBERG, BARRY AMIDON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC.
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, Inc.
as 11-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, BARRY AMIDON, JACK DANHOF and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC.
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
