Cases 21 - 30 of 1,479
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ruiz-Romero v. Santiago-Colon
as 24-1333
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
PABLO SANTIAGO-COLON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
United States Department of Justice v. Colon-Rios et al
as 3:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
Juan Colon, Margarita Maymo and Juan B. Colon-Rios
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de PR Inc., et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff:
ASOCIACION DE DETALLISTAS DE GASOLINA DE PUERTO RICO, INC., A&E SERVICE STATION, INC., ANTONIO JUAN LEON and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, represented by its Governor Hon. Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia, HON. DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, HON. HIRAM TORRES MONTALVO, as Interim Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico and others
Ruiz-Romero v. Colon-Santiago et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Pablo Colon-Santiago, Idelfonso Torres and Joel Caraballo-Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cotto-Colon v. DeJoy
as 3:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Mr JANICE COTTO-COLON and Janice Cotto-Colon
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
