Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Jones v. NCO Financial Services et al
as 1:2013cv12101
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
NCO Financial Services , Action Collection Agency, Capital One Credit Card Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Cobb
as 1:2011mc91325
Respondent:
Steven J. Cobb
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cobb v. Rabe, et al
as 11-2189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW COBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE RABE, GEORGE A. BERMAN, KATHRYN ANN O'LEARY and others
Mead v. Independence Association, et al
as 10-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE MEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION, CHRISTINE BRADEN, individually and in her official capacity as Licensor, Division of Licensing and Regulatory Services for Maine Department of Health and Human Services and CHRISTINE COBB, individually and in her official capacity as Director, Division of Licensing and Regulatory Services for Maine Department of Health and Human Services
MEAD v. INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2009cv00584
Plaintiff:
JANE MEAD
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION , CHRISTINE BRADEN and CHRISTINE COBB
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diaz-Piza et al
as 3:2009mc00277
Petitioner:
Maria Magdalena Diaz-Piza, Maria Magdalena Cobb-Piza and Ana Maria Cobb-Piza
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Cobb v. Rabe et al
as 1:2009cv11477
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cobb
Defendant:
Jane Rabe and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
