Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 329
Lech v. Von Goeler, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1507
Plaintiff / Appellant: LIDIA LECH
Defendant / Appellee: DOROTHEA VON GOELER, BAYSTATE MEDICAL PRACTICES, INC., HAMPDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Mirabal-Pargas et al v. DCF Exchange, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01544
Plaintiff: Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Aida Mirabal-Delgado and Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal
Defendant: DCF Exchange, LLC, Nathaniel M. Pulsifier, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Doe, et al
as 21-1783
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
BRADLEY v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff: GEORGE E BRADLEY
Defendant: YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, PORTLAND CITY POLICE, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Caldwell v. Coll-Watlington, et al
as 22-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMMETT W. CALDWELL
Defendant / Appellee: LUIS COLL-WATLINGTON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
OK Resorts of Puerto Rico, Inc. et al v. Charles Taylor Adjusting, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01889
Defendant: John Doe 3, John Doe 4, Integrand Assurance Co. and others
Plaintiff: Ok Resorts Of Puerto Rico, Inc., Executive Fantasy Hotel, Inc. and Riverside Resort, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cordero-Ladner v. D12 et al
as 3:2021cv01009
Plaintiff: Jose Ramon Cordero-Ladner and Joey
Defendant: Paul D. Rosengerg, Warren Mitch, Interscope Records and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, et al v. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, et al
as 21-1773
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, SPEECH FIRST, INC. and others
Burgos-Hernandez, et al. v. Metro Santurce, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff: ISUE BURGOS HERNANDEZ, GUARIONEX ALVARADO ADORNO, in representation of their minor sons YEAB, YAAB and YOAB, Isue Burgos-Hernandez and Guarionex Alvarado-Adorno
Defendant: Metro Santurce, Inc., Maria Casado and her husband JOHN DOE, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership, EDNA FIGUEROA and her husband John Doe 1, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?