Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff: Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant: Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party: Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund v. C. W. Clancy Mechanical Contracting, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11808
Plaintiff: Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: C. W. Clancy Mechanical Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund v. Southern Air, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11672
Plaintiff: Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Southern Air, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 P, et al v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corpor, et al
as 12-8040
Plaintiff - Respondent: PLUMBERS' UNION LOCAL NO. 12 PENSION FUND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS' & PIPEFITTERS' WELFARE EDUCATIONAL FUND and NECA-IBEW HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Petitioner: NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, JOHN P. GRAHAM, NATHAN GORIN and others
Defendant: ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-AF2, ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST AR2, ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST AR3 and others
Trustees of Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Annuity Fund, Pension Fund and Health & Welfare Fund v. Frias Concrete Floors
as 1:2012cv10020
Plaintiff: Trustees of Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Annuity Fund, Pension Fund and Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Frias Concrete Floors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Iron Workers District Council of New England Health & Welfare Fund v. Woodford et al
as 1:2011cv11856
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Iron Workers District Council of New England Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: James Woodford
Counter_claimant: James Woodford
Counter_defendant: Trustees of the Iron Workers District Council of New England Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Iron Workers Health & Welfare Fund v. Woodford et al
as 1:2011cv11857
Plaintiff: Iron Workers Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: James Woodford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Pension Fund et al v. D&M Concrete Floor Co.
as 1:2011cv11827
Plaintiff: Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Pension Fund , Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Annuity Fund and Boston Plasterers and Cement Masons Local 534 Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: D&M Concrete Floor Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Automotive Industries Pension v. Textron Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2106
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND AND THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff: OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee: TEXTRON INC., LEWIS B. CAMPBELL, TED R. FRENCH and others
Interested Party: CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund v. Winchester Mechanical Service, Co.
as 1:2011cv11218
Plaintiff: Trustees of Pipefitters Local 537 Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Winchester Mechanical Service, Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?