Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Barros-Villahermosa v. US, et al
as 09-2614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS BARROS-VILLAHERMOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, MARCELINO BORGES and others
Defendant:
JESUS M. TORRES-DE LEON and JOSE MUNIZ
Interested Party:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Barros-Villahermosa v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2009cv01524
Plaintiff:
Carlos Barros-Villahermosa
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, PR Police Department, Jose Muniz-Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cruz-Vazquez, et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, In, et al
as 09-1758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZEL I. CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, RAUL A. CRUZ-RIVERA, LUCY I. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., BRENDA M. TORRES-PEREZ, EDUARDO GOMEZ-TORRES and others
Defendant:
MINERVA DIAZ-ARISTUD
Colibri Workers for Rights and Justice et al v. Andis et al
as 1:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Colibri Workers for Rights and Justice, Vidalia Adalio, Peter Almanzar and others
Defendant:
Founders Equity, Phoenix Consulting and Colibri Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Esso Standard Oil v. Lopez-Freytes, et al
as 09-1274
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, (Puerto Rico)
Defendant - Appellant:
FLOR DEL VALLE LOPEZ, Associate Member of the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board, in his official and personal capacities, ANGEL BERRIOS SILVESTRE, Associate Member of the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board, in his official and personal capacities, NORMAN VELAZQUEZ TORRES, Attorney for the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board, in his official and personal capacities and others
Defendant:
ESTEBAN MUJICA COTTO and SUCESION RIVERA DIAZ, Represented by Antonia Colon-Diaz
Interested Party:
AIDA LEXIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, ALEXIS ORTIZ-SAEZ, ALMA M. TORRES, in representation of her minor child P.R.T. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
