Cases 31 - 40 of 351
Romero-Acosta v. Bottles, Kindred Spirits, Inc
as 3:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Omar E Romero-Acosta and Omar E. Romero-Acosta
Defendant:
Bottles, Kindred Spirits, Inc and Richard Gonsalves
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of Justice
as 23-1212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Romero-Aguilar v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00094
Petitioner:
Olvin Romero-Aguilar
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz-Romero v. Centro Medico de Rio Piedras, et al
as 23-1173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRO MEDICO DE RIO PIEDRAS, area de sala de emergencias and INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS FORENSES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ruiz-Romero v. Hospital Metropolitano Dr. Pila
as 3:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Hospital Metropolitano Dr. Pila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz-Romero v. Centro Medico de Rio Piedras et al
as 3:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Centro Medico de Rio Piedras and Instituto de Ciencias Forenses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ruiz-Romero v. Stelaris Food 369, Inc.
as 22-1973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
STELARIS FOOD 369, INC.
Ruiz-Romero v. Wendco of P.R., Inc.
as 22-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDCO, of P.R., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
