Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Spencer, II v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2016cv12076
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer, II
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Daniella Frasca, Martin J. Walsh and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Paul McKenzie and Jose L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
In re: Dickey
as 16-1799
Petitioner:
JAMES DICKEY
Respondent:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
Dickey v. Boston, MA, et al
as 16-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BOSTON, MA, through the Inspectional Service Department, EDWARD COBURN, individually and in his official capacity as lawyer for the City of Boston, JAMES JOSEPH COTTER, III, individually and in his official capacity as receiver for the Boston Housing Court and others
South Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. The City of Boston et al
as 1:2016cv10519
Plaintiff:
South Boston Allied War Veterans Council
Defendant:
The City of Boston , Police Commissioner William B. Evans and Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
