Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SAWYER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
VASILIKE SAWYER
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC and FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curley, et al v. UPS
as 13-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CURLEY and SANDRA CURLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Morales-Quirindongo v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01244
Plaintiff:
John Morales-Quirindongo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901 v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01694
Plaintiff:
Union de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bennet v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2012cv11219
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bennet
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chalupa v. United Parcel Services, Inc
as 1:2012cv10868
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Chalupa
Defendant:
United Parcel Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Franco-Rivera v United Parcel Services
as 3:2011cv01765
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Franco-Rivera
Defendant:
United Parcel Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
National Labor Relations Board, Region 24 v United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01499
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board, Region 24
Respondent:
United Parcel Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
