Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
US v. Hernandez-Negron
as 10-1769
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, a/k/a Tito Quiju
Interested Party: PEDRO J. PIERLUISI
Cordell et al v. Sabol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv10879
Plaintiff: Roger D. Cordell
Defendant: Carolyn Sabol, Jose Barron, John Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Hernandez-Negron
as 10-1221
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, a/k/a Tito Quiju
Interested Party: PEDRO J. PIERLUISI
Gunboat Co. v. Tito
as 1:2009cv00329
Plaintiff: Gunboat Co. and Gunboat Co.
Defendant: Dennis Tito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract None
PPV Connection, Inc. et al v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2009cv01447
Plaintiff: PPV Connection, Inc., Conjugal Partnership Nunez-Doe 2 and Conjugal Partnership Rivera-Doe 3
Defendant: Carlos Hernandez, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Hernandez-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Type: Other Statutes None
Abrante v. St. Amand We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1020
Petitioner - Appellant: TITO ABRANTE
Respondent - Appellee: PETER ST. AMAND, Superintendent, MCI - Cedar Junction
US v. Perez-Colon
as 08-2359
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MANUEL PEREZ-COLON, a/k/a Tito Manuel, a/k/a Sealed Defendant 2
US v. Chevres-Motta
as 08-2011
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MANUEL CHEVRES-MOTTA, a/k/a Tito Pastor, a/k/a Penco, a/k/a Gavilan
US v. Chevres-Motta
as 08-2010
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MANUEL CHEVRES-MOTTA, a/k/a Tito Pastor, a/k/a Penco, a/k/a Gavilan
US v. Rivera-Morales
as 08-1815
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: EDUARDO RIVERA-MORALES, a/k/a Tito Kia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?