Cases 41 - 50 of 542
Canada v. Aceto, et al
as 1:2018cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Canada
Defendant:
Jeffery Aceto, Joseph Jankowski, Ashbel T. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheridan et al v. Page et al
as 1:2018cv00449
Defendant:
Home Buyers Warranty Corporation, Leroy Page, Southland Log Homes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriele Meyer and Robert Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
White v. McBurney et al
as 1:2018cv00261
Defendant:
John F. McBurney, III, Peter C. Kilmartin, Kimberly Ahern and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt L. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Crone et al
as 1:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Crone, Lieutenant Baker, Correctional Officer LeVasseur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2018cv00277
Notice Only:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Deciantis v. Wall et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Petitioner:
Anthony Deciantis
Respondent:
A.T. Wall and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zab v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2018cv00070
Petitioner:
Cody-Allen Zab
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and Ashbel T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hallam v. Wall et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Hallam, II
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jeffery Aceto and Lieutenant Amaral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martinez v. Duffy et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
Duffy, Mathew Kettle and A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botelho v. Wall et al
as 1:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Botelho
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jeffrey Aceto, Amy Gelinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
