Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Benson v. UNUM Provident Insurance Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv10397
Plaintiff:
Brian C Benson
Defendant:
UNUM Provident Insurance Corporation, Bigband Networks, Inc and ATTRIUS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Boino v. City of Pittsfield et al
as 3:2012cv30193
Plaintiff:
Maureen P Boino
Defendant:
City of Pittsfield and Tracey A Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bensons International Systems, Inc. v. Staples, Inc.
as 1:2012cv11730
Plaintiff:
Bensons International Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Con-Tech Systems, Ltd. v. Vermont Lumber & Stone Works, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv40107
Plaintiff:
Con-Tech Systems, Ltd.
Defendant:
Vermont Lumber & Stone Works, Inc. , Ragnar Benson, LLC and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unger v. Packer et al
as 1:2012cv10543
Plaintiff:
Les L. Unger
Defendant:
Richard A. Packer, Robert J. Halliday, James W. Biondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WENTWORTH v. ECKLAND AND BLANDO LLP et al
as 1:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
LLOYD H WENTWORTH
Defendant:
ECKLAND AND BLANDO LLP and FAEGRE AND BENSON LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benson v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv11935
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Benson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oshry v. GOGO Worldwide Vacations, Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv11518
Defendant:
GOGO Worldwide Vacations, Inc. , Dean Smith , Natalie Benson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Oshry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hofland v. Cyr, et al
as 11-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND, a/k/a R.B.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. CYR, BRUCE A. CARDELLO, SUSAN CARBON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
