Cases 61 - 70 of 1,702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ortiz-Roche v. Physician Correctional Corp.
as 3:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Jose L Ortiz-Roche
Defendant:
Physician Correctional Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado-Gonzalez, et al v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority, et al
as 23-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN MALDONADO-GONZALEZ, MUNICIPALITY OF MOROVIS, GENOVEVA LOPEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, DORIEL I. PAGAN-CRESPO, in her personal and official capacity Executive Director and JOSE A. RIVERA ORTIZ, in his official capacity as Regional Executive Director
Ortiz Trejo v. Garland
as 23-1412
Petitioner:
MARIANO ORTIZ TREJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Puerto Rico Soccer League NFP, Corp., et.al., v. Federacion Puertorriquena de Futbol, et.al.,
as 3:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Puerto Rico Soccer League, Inc., Juan Miguel Cornejo, Maria Larracuente and others
Defendant:
Ivan E. Rivera-Gutierrez, Luis Mozo-Canete, John Doe 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Marrero-Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Rosa Margarita Marrero-Ortiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
