Cases 71 - 80 of 148
Nina M. v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00339
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nina Frances McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Rosado v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30124
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Hector Luis Rosado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Randy M. v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Randy Myers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Szczesny v. Saul
as 20-1659
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commssioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAZIMIERZ JAN SZCZESNY and KAZIMIERZ JAN SZCZESNY, JR.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Tracy v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30102
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Renee Elizabeth Tracy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Afshar v. Saul
as 20-1526
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN L. AFSHAR
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Feliciano-Colon v. Saul
as 3:2020cv10999
Plaintiff:
Julio A. Feliciano-Colon
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Feliciano-Colon v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10999
Plaintiff:
Julio A. Feliciano-Colon
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tuttle v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30064
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Tuttle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Myers v. Saul
as 20-1497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
