Cases 71 - 80 of 703
Criscio v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2022cv30044
Plaintiff:
Michael Criscio
Defendant:
City of Springfield, MGM Springfield, LLC, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meacham v. UHealthSolutions, Inc.
as 4:2022cv40032
Plaintiff:
Scott Meacham
Defendant:
UHealthSolutions, Inc.
Brocklesby et al v. Muzi Motors, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10384
Plaintiff:
Scott Brocklesby, Justin Maharath, James Jubb and others
Defendant:
Muzi Motors, Inc., Neal Cammarano, Glen Cammarano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Aftosmes et al v. Town of Hingham
as 1:2022cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Aftosmes, Cameron Allegra, James Arena and others
Defendant:
Town of Hingham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCullough v. Roby
as 1:2022cv10177
Plaintiff:
John L McCullough
Defendant:
Scott Roby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Aphex BioCleanse Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Aphex BioCleanse Systems, Inc. and Charles Ragland
Not Classified By Court:
David Olund
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Brown v. CMD, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10055
Plaintiff:
d/b/a Andrew Philip Brown
Defendant:
CMD, LLC, Ryan Scott Wildrick, II, Ryan Anthony Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee et al
as 1:2021cv11997
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jay Scott Lee, Geoffrey Allen Wall and Benjamin Thompson Kirk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Okosi v. Roby
as 1:2021cv11884
Plaintiff:
Michael Okosi
Defendant:
Scott Roby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauersachs et al v. Gaziano et al
as 1:2021cv11866
Plaintiff:
Mark Bauersachs and Marcieli Bauersachs
Defendant:
Frank M. Gaziano, David A. Lowy, Elspeth B Cypher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
