Cases 81 - 90 of 377
Duffy v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12342
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Altman v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30177
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Derrick Altman
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Darlene H. v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00608
Plaintiff:
Darlene Harrington
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
B. v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30174
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
K. A. B.
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Parrlla v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01813
Plaintiff:
Carmen M Parrlla and Carmen M. Parilla
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12243
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
SolMaria Gonzalez
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fragoso v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30171
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Edite R. Fragoso
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Diaz v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01757
Plaintiff:
Mr. Luis Diaz
Defendant:
Hon. Nancy A. Berryhill and Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Capizzi v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12043
Plaintiff:
Salvatore John Capizzi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Quinones-Lopez v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01732
Plaintiff:
Sandra I. Quinones-Lopez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
