Cases 81 - 90 of 703
Jane Doe v. Town of Acton et al
as 1:2021cv11849
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Town of Acton, Massachusetts Acton-Boxborough Reginal School District, Scott Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storer v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 1:2021cv11776
Plaintiff:
Scott Storer
Defendant:
USCIS and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Lu v. Laprocina et al
as 1:2021cv11493
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Paul Laprocina, Jr, Michael J Lepizzera, Scott DeMello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bishay et al v. Ricciuti et al
as 1:2021cv11227
Defendant:
Arent Fox LLP, Michael D Ricciuti, Diana L Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Retained Realty, Inc. v. The Heirs, Devisees and Legal Representatives of Charles Sanderson III et al
as 1:2021cv11105
Defendant:
Steven C Burne, James Sanderson, Paul F. Keating and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Sanderson, IV, Todd Burne and Retained Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreland et al v. Father & Son Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11096
Plaintiff:
Rhian Sugden, Sandra Valencia, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Roberto D. Garcia and Father & Son Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rego v. Fosko et al
as 1:2021cv11045
Defendant:
Well Path, Barnstable County Jail, Chris Fosko and others
Plaintiff:
Scott F. Rego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv40062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Doane v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv10990
Defendant:
Scott Thompson and Astoria Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert A Doane
Artem v. New England Law Boston et al
as 1:2021cv10981
Defendant:
New England Law | Boston and Scott Brown
Plaintiff:
George Artem and Pro Se Party George Artem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
