Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Field v. Matt Auto Trans, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11116
Plaintiff:
John Field
Defendant:
Matt Auto Trans, LLC, Liza Maria Moya and Luis Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
US v. Moya-Paulina
as 22-1831
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
CRISTIAN MOYA-PAULINA, a/k/a Cristian Moya-Paulino
AbuAlrub et al v. Puerto Rico Port Authority et al
as 3:2021cv01203
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Port Authority, Otis Elevator Company, Luis Munoz Marin International Airport and others
Plaintiff:
Ola Talal AbuAlrub and Amer Rashed Ahmad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 19-1241
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN CADY, ELIOT POLICE DEPARTMENT, SA STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR. and others
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, US BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Interested Party:
TRAVIS WEBBER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Manuel Jose Bencosme-Almonte et al
as 3:2018cv02021
Defendant:
Conyugal Partnership Bencosme-Balbuena, Manuel Jose Bencosme-Almonte, Iguaniona Altagracia Balbuena Moya and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duckworth v. R3 Education, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11169
Plaintiff:
Hugh Duckworth
Defendant:
R3 Education, Inc., Steven C Rodger and Terry J Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 14-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MCNEIL, TD BANKNORTH, N. A. and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF, United States Attorneys
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR., CHRISTOPHER J. DURKIN, DALE L. ARMSTRONG and others
Moya v. Holder, Jr.
as 13-1941
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL MOYA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
