Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nevarez-Chiclana v. Lopez-Figueroa et al
as 3:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Sheila Nevarez-Chiclana
Defendant:
Antonio Lopez, Juan A Caceres-Mendez, Roberto Rivera-Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alicea-Hernandez v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Angel Alicea-Hernandez
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco Sanchez, et al v. Esso Standard Oil Company, et al
as 10-2317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE FRANCISCO SANCHEZ, DOLORES SERVICE STATION AND AUTO PARTS, INC., JORGE LUIS SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, (Puerto Rico)
Defendant:
MANUELA GOMEZ and UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF THE ESTATE OF BENITO SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ, ERNESTO BALAY, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIT, QUALITY BOARD OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and others
Rodriguez-Sanchez, et al v. Municipality of Santa Isabel, et al
as 09-2635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELSIE RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ, CELIA ORTIZ-ESPADA, ANA A. ORTIZ-RIVERA and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO A. REYES-ALOMAR, DILFIA DE-JESUS-SANTIAGO, ANGOLITA RODRIGUEZ-COLON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ENRIQUE H. QUESTELL-ALVARADO, individually, and as Mayor of Santa Isabel, MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA ISABEL and NATALIE RODRIGUEZ-CARDONA, Individually And As Human Resources Director Of Santa Isabel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
