Cases 1 - 10 of 156,283
IQE KC, LLC v. Akoustis Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv91053
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
CARTER v. MAINE STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
DJVAN A CARTER
Defendant:
MAINE STATE POLICE and BLAINE SILK
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOKES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MELVIN C STOKES, JR
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Caruna Spa & Wellness Center Inc. Brickell v. Candela Corporation
as 1:2024cv11344
Plaintiff:
Caruna Spa & Wellness Center Inc. Brickell
Defendant:
Candela Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fulcher v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11342
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fulcher
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bouvier et al
as 3:2024cv30071
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Office Of Appellate Operations,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hooks v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11343
Plaintiff:
Leticia Hooks
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Producrtion SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Rights to Special Educational Services
Coelho v. Town of Dartmouth et al
as 1:2024cv11346
Plaintiff:
Nelson Coelho
Defendant:
Town of Dartmouth, Kyle Berube and Alec Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
