Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WESCOTT et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv00072
Defendant:
MARY ANN SAAR, JEFFREY HAWKINS, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WESCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEENE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEENE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH LEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2016md02753
Plaintiff:
Amanda Brake, All Plaintiffs, Ann Ackley and others
In Re:
In re: Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ackley v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv11625
Plaintiff:
Larry Ackley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ackley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv11625
Plaintiff:
Larry Ackley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ackley v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Ann Ackley
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DISH NETWORK LLC et al v. ACKLEY
as 2:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
DISH NETWORK LLC , ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC and NAGRASTAR LLC
Defendant:
FRANK ACKLEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
ACKLEY v. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P ACKLEY
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
