Cases filed in Maine
ISMAIL et al v. ROBINSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: AHMED ISMAIL
Defendant: PHILLIP ROBINSON and OFFICER WRIGLEY
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SADEK v. OFFICER UNDERWOOD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00374
Plaintiff: AHMED SADEK
Defendant: OFFICER UNDERWOOD and OFFICER WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00087
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAJI et al v. PHARMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff: ABDIFATAH HAJI , SAID ALI , ABDURAZAK ISAAC and others
Defendant: PHARMERICA CORPORATION , PHARMERICA EAST INC , PHARMERICA INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY SERVICES INC and others
Consol_plaintiff: ABDIRHMAN AHMED GURHAN
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Civil Rights Both
AHMED v. MOHAMMAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00257
Plaintiff: AZIZUDDIN AHMED
Defendant: SALEEMUDDIN MOHAMMAD and ASRA SYEDA
Counter_claimant: SALEEMUDDIN MOHAMMAD and ASRA SYEDA
Counter_defendant: AZIZUDDIN AHMED
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?